If you are interested in exploring not just family genealogy but also the broader history of your family and the local area, it is worth examining parish court records.
Where to Find Parish Court Records?
These documents are primarily stored in the Latvian State Historical Archives in dedicated parish court collections, though some may also be kept in regional museums. While parish courts existed earlier, the period most relevant for researchers is the 19th century.
What Was a Parish Court?
A parish court (pagasta tiesa) was established in every manor (muiža) or parish (pagasts). In 19th-century Latvia, parishes corresponded to manor boundaries. However, in the 20th century, parishes underwent significant changes, including mergers, renaming, and administrative restructuring, and manors ceased to exist as economic units.
The term pagasts historically referred to a rural administrative unit, often linked to a specific manor. It served as both a geographic and social framework, encompassing a community of peasants who lived and worked within the manor's lands.
The Structure and Role of Parish Courts in the 19th Century
In the 19th century, parish courts typically consisted of three judges. In Vidzeme, their activities were governed by the 1804 and later the 1819 peasant laws, while in Kurzeme, the 1817 peasant laws applied. In Vidzeme, one judge was elected to represent the manor, another represented the farmers, and the third represented the laborers. Each representative was chosen by members of their respective social group.
Parish courts primarily dealt with civil cases between peasants and disputes between peasants and the manor. Common cases included:
Issues related to labor contracts,
Disputes over unpaid rent for houses or debts between peasants, and
Other relatively minor infractions.
At the beginning of the century, one of the court’s primary responsibilities was to penalize peasants for disobedience to the manor.
For a time, parish courts also fulfilled policing functions, except for handling criminal cases. Both in Kurzeme and Vidzeme, the courts had similar authority. They could impose punishments such as up to 30 strokes with a stick or up to three days of detention. Women and children under 14 could receive no more than 20 strokes, and later women were exempted from corporal punishment altogether. Other groups, including craftsmen, farmers, individuals over 60, and the sick, were also protected from corporal punishment.
In Kurzeme, parish courts also had jurisdiction over minor policing matters. These courts comprised three to seven members, and the court chairman often served as the parish elder.
Parish Court Activities from 1866 to the 1930s
The 1866 Baltic Parish Law brought significant changes. Parish courts were relieved of their policing duties, limiting their jurisdiction to civil cases and minor offenses.
Further reforms in 1889 mandated that parish courts consist of no fewer than four judges, elected through a secret ballot by all parish residents. The courts were authorized to handle:
Disputes involving movable property and monetary claims up to 100 rubles,
Guardianship and custodianship matters, and
Inheritance cases, including drafting and approving inheritance distribution plans.
If a person was dissatisfied with a parish court’s decision, the next level of appeal was the church court in Vidzeme or the district court in Kurzeme. After 1889, appeals were heard by the higher peasant court (zemnieku virstiesa).
In the 1920s and 1930s, the courts primarily handled guardianship, custodianship, and limited civil cases.
Why Are Parish Court Records Useful for Genealogical Research?
Parish court records offer valuable insights into local events and everyday life. For example, these documents may contain:
Information about the transfer of farms to new owners, including descriptions of associated buildings,
Annual rent amounts for houses, and
Details about disputes between community members.
In some cases, the records include personal stories. For instance, they might document a servant girl’s claim for child support for her illegitimate children, including the potential father’s name. Such details can provide significant context for family history research.
Challenges in Using Parish Court Records
Parish court records were written in Latvian, but in handwritten form and using old orthography. This can make them difficult to read, particularly for those unfamiliar with historical handwriting styles or spelling conventions.
Sources: Latviešu konversācijas vārdnīca. Vol. XV. Riga: Grāmatu apgāds A. Gulbis, 1937.
Comments